Persistent symptoms
A feeling of pressure, tenderness when biting or a dull ache in a tooth that has already had root canal treatment — even years afterwards.
A second chance for your tooth — even when others are already recommending extraction. With a dental operating microscope, CBCT and a bioceramic root filling we achieve success rates of over 85% in root canal retreatment.
Endodontic retreatment is a repeat root canal treatment on a tooth that has already been treated. It is the first choice when an existing root filling is not sufficient — before extraction and an implant are even considered.
Studies show: 30–40% of all root-treated teeth develop problems in the long term — often because canals were missed during the first treatment, the irrigation protocols were not adequate or the restoration leaked. With modern microscopic techniques most of these problems can be corrected today.
We take the time for an honest assessment: can your tooth be saved? In more than 80% of the cases we see the answer is: yes.
Retreatment becomes necessary when symptoms persist or reappear after a root canal treatment — or when the radiograph shows inflammation that has not healed.
A feeling of pressure, tenderness when biting or a dull ache in a tooth that has already had root canal treatment — even years afterwards.
A recurring ‘spot’ on the gum above the treated tooth — a sign of chronic inflammation at the root apex.
A dark zone at the root end — a sign of chronic bone inflammation, often symptom-free for years.
The root filling does not reach the root apex, has gaps or shows leaking areas — visible on the radiograph.
Before an expensive crown or bridge is placed on a root-treated tooth — making sure the root filling is sealed.
When the crown or filling above the root filling has started to leak and bacteria can reach the canal system again.
Retreatment is more demanding than the first treatment. It calls for different instruments, more experience — and above all a microscope, without which many findings stay invisible.
The most common reason for failure: a canal that was never found. The second mesiobuccal canal (MB2) in upper molars in particular is missed in up to 40% of cases. With a microscope and CBCT we find it.
Gutta-percha, posts, separated instruments — we remove old materials precisely under the microscope, without losing healthy tooth structure unnecessarily.
Chronic infections live in biofilms — resistant to simple irrigation. We activate the irrigating solutions with ultrasonic and sonic systems in order to remove even stubborn biofilms.
Almost always indicated in retreatment. The CBCT shows hidden canals, root fractures, the extent of apical lesions and the true root anatomy. More on CBCT diagnostics
Before every retreatment: three-dimensional imaging. Hidden canals, root fractures, the true extent of the inflammation — visible before we treat.
We go through the findings, the prospects of success and the possible alternatives — openly and honestly. Only then do we begin.
Under the microscope we remove the old restoration — crown, core build-up and, where present, root posts. Gently, with minimal loss of tooth structure.
Gutta-percha and sealer are removed from every canal under the microscope and with special solvents. Hidden canals are located.
Ultrasonically activated disinfecting solutions also reach the areas that cannot be reached mechanically — isthmuses, lateral canals, apical deltas.
For severely inflamed teeth: a calcium hydroxide dressing for 1–4 weeks to eliminate remaining bacteria. In straightforward cases this step is not needed.
A dense three-dimensional filling with gutta-percha and a bioceramic sealer — modern materials that bond with the root instead of merely sealing it.
The tooth is built up stably, and your own dentist places the final crown. After 6 and 12 months we check the result radiographically.
Retreatment carried out under the microscope achieves success rates of 80–90%.
Up to 40% of second mesiobuccal canals are missed without a microscope — we find them.
Retreatment is more complex than a first treatment — typically 2–3 visits.
Retreatment is more involved than a first treatment: more visits, more demanding diagnostics, often a CBCT, longer work under the microscope. The fees reflect this effort.
The statutory health insurance does not routinely cover retreatment — it is a private service. Patients with private health insurance are as a rule fully reimbursed under the GOZ (German scale of dental fees).
Before every treatment we draw up a written treatment and cost plan. You know exactly what to expect — no surprises.
What patients ask most often — before they decide on retreatment.
The most common reasons: missed canals (e.g. the second mesiobuccal canal MB2 in an upper molar — up to 40% are missed without a microscope), incomplete cleaning owing to complex anatomy, a leaking root filling or a leaking crown above the root filling, through which bacteria enter again.
With a microscope and CBCT diagnostics we identify most of these causes — and can usually put them right.
Retreatment carried out under the microscope achieves success rates of 80–90%. This requires careful diagnostics (usually with CBCT), a microscope, an experienced practitioner and modern irrigation protocols.
For teeth without these conditions the success rate of retreatment is often only around 50%.
For many teeth judged not worth keeping, retreatment is still possible. Only after microscopic diagnostics with CBCT can it be assessed reliably whether keeping the tooth makes sense.
A second opinion is almost always worth it. Our principle: if we cannot save the tooth, we tell you honestly and go through the alternatives with you.
Costs are usually between 800 and 1,500 euros, depending on the tooth, the number of canals and the level of difficulty. Complex retreatment with post removal can cost more.
Patients with private health insurance are as a rule fully reimbursed under the GOZ. The statutory health insurance does not routinely cover retreatment.
Studies show comparable success rates for retreatment (~85%) and implants (~95%). But: your own tooth has advantagesthat no implant can replace — its own proprioception, natural aesthetics, no foreign body in the bone.
Retreatment is often less expensive and less invasive. Our advice: look at every option for keeping the tooth first — an implant is still possible afterwards.
Post removal is demanding, but with a microscope and ultrasonics it is possible today in the vast majority of cases — including fibreglass, titanium and cast posts. More on this: Separated instrument & post removal
No. You can book an appointment with us directly — even without a referral from your own dentist. If possible, please bring recent radiographs with you; it speeds up the diagnosis.
If orthograde retreatment is technically not possible — for example with posts that cannot be removed, firmly lodged separated instruments or certain anatomical situations — an apicoectomy may be the right choice.
In most cases retreatment is the first step — and only if it does not succeed does the surgical procedure come into play.
Sometimes a tooth needs more than retreatment — we have the specialised procedures required.
Microsurgical procedure when orthograde treatment reaches its limits.
Find out more AdvancedRemoving separated instruments or root posts under the microscope.
Find out more DiagnosticsThree-dimensional imaging for predictable results.
Find out more RepairSealing iatrogenic defects in the root wall with MTA/bioceramics.
Find out moreSecond opinion & diagnostics can be booked directly. Please bring your recent radiographs with you.